[civsoc-mw] No new voters roll

[Maybach Woyee]

Inu Bambo Chimimba,
Why are you making my friend KPD to sweat on a small matter? He is very
right and has been making his position clear from the beginning.

On Wed, 7 Oct. 2020, 14:31 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
wrote:

> KPD,
>
> I am not worried about you. They are people who are turning 18 almost on a
> daily basis. At that point they become eligible voters and their right to
> vote guaranteed by the Constitution.
>
> They do not have to wait until the next cycle of general elections, when
> they can vote in a by election (an acceptable one). Otherwise they are
> disenfranchised; their vote suppressed. The EC should not be complicit to
> that.
>
> Anyway I have had my say one this.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:41 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> TC,
>
> You know where I am based. I have voted in general elections 3 times. I
> have voted in 2 council by-elections and 1 parliamentary by-election.
>
> I have my voters card that I keep for 5 years and no one registers during
> a by-election.
>
> It just needs a candidate to take MEC to court for adding voters who are
> not properly verified.
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 13:20 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You view is based on divination KPD. Not the law.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:16 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> TC,
>>
>> In the first paragraph is what court ruled.
>>
>> Paragraph 2 and 3 are my views.
>>
>> I brought in your views in paragraph 4. I did not want you to say, "only
>> in a by-election arising from a nullification of an election"
>>
>> My view is that any by-election should not bring in fresh voters
>> regardless of the circumstances that led to that by-election. The only
>> differentiator is that in a nullification no new candidates are allowed.
>>
>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 13:05 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> KPD
>>>
>>> How do you reconcile your first paragraph and the last paragraph.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 6:59 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Court has ruled that there should be no new voters roll for by-elections
>>> where the results were nullified. Same candidates.
>>>
>>> I insist that there should be no new voters roll in any by-election.
>>> Registration of new voters for any by-election is illegal.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, regardless of MEC being headed by a judge, it will still
>>> take another judge, after wasting so much money by petitioners and
>>> respondents, for MEC to do the right thing.
>>>
>>> The argument by TC that those who never registered in the main elections
>>> should be brought in through the window and vote in a by-election doesn't
>>> hold.
>>>
>>> Tiyeni nazo.
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>> is
>>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>> is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> civsoc-mw mailing list
> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> civsoc-mw mailing list
> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/pipermail/civsoc-mw/attachments/20201007/27a36041/attachment.htm>