[civsoc-mw] No new voters roll

Wed Oct 7 16:31:17 CAT 2020

TC thinks more than a lawyer. His knowledge of the law in this matter is
from not a mere lawyer but i would say a 'juris'

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 16:13, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:

> MW,
>
> Don't worry. Sometimes TC removes his law knowledge and thinks like a
> person at Mbwandilo.
>
> Can you imagine him saying people turn 18 everyday and shouldn't be denied
> vote.
>
> Yes. A by-election is not a planned occurrence. We can spend 5 years with
> no MP or Councillor dying or being convicted. No one who turns 18 can
> complain that they can't wait until next election to vote.
>
> Even the illegal registration being done now will exclude people who turn
> 18. Registration closes maybe 4 weeks before elections to allow compilation
> of voters roll and printing of ballots. What happens to those born after
> registration closes and time boting is done?
>
> Right to vote is not absolute and a person can decide not to vote. A
> person can also be denied the right to vote for various reasons.
>
> TC's thinking will make us register people while voting is in progress. Or
> that we should have elections everyday because people turn 18 every day.
> Very absurd indeed.
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 15:30 Maybach Woyee, <mbchwoyee5 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Inu Bambo Chimimba,
>> Why are you making my friend KPD to sweat on a small matter? He is very
>> right and has been making his position clear from the beginning.
>>
>> On Wed, 7 Oct. 2020, 14:31 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> KPD,
>>>
>>> I am not worried about you. They are people who are turning 18 almost on
>>> a daily basis. At that point they become eligible voters and their right to
>>> vote guaranteed by the Constitution.
>>>
>>> They do not have to wait until the next cycle of general elections, when
>>> they can vote in a by election (an acceptable one). Otherwise they are
>>> disenfranchised; their vote suppressed. The EC should not be complicit to
>>> that.
>>>
>>> Anyway I have had my say one this.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:41 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> TC,
>>>
>>> You know where I am based. I have voted in general elections 3 times. I
>>> have voted in 2 council by-elections and 1 parliamentary by-election.
>>>
>>> I have my voters card that I keep for 5 years and no one registers
>>> during a by-election.
>>>
>>> It just needs a candidate to take MEC to court for adding voters who are
>>> not properly verified.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 13:20 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You view is based on divination KPD. Not the law.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:16 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> TC,
>>>>
>>>> In the first paragraph is what court ruled.
>>>>
>>>> Paragraph 2 and 3 are my views.
>>>>
>>>> I brought in your views in paragraph 4. I did not want you to say,
>>>> "only in a by-election arising from a nullification of an election"
>>>>
>>>> My view is that any by-election should not bring in fresh voters
>>>> regardless of the circumstances that led to that by-election. The only
>>>> differentiator is that in a nullification no new candidates are allowed.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 13:05 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> KPD
>>>>>
>>>>> How do you reconcile your first paragraph and the last paragraph.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 6:59 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Court has ruled that there should be no new voters roll for
>>>>> by-elections where the results were nullified. Same candidates.
>>>>>
>>>>> I insist that there should be no new voters roll in any by-election.
>>>>> Registration of new voters for any by-election is illegal.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, regardless of MEC being headed by a judge, it will
>>>>> still take another judge, after wasting so much money by petitioners and
>>>>> respondents, for MEC to do the right thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> The argument by TC that those who never registered in the main
>>>>> elections should be brought in through the window and vote in a by-election
>>>>> doesn't hold.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tiyeni nazo.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>>>>> and is
>>>>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>>>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
>>>>> and is
>>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>> is
>>>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>> is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>> is
>>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>> is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> civsoc-mw mailing list
> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>

-- 
Patrick Mphatso CHINGUWO
saved by Christ Jesus to serve Him only

Box 962,ZOMBA
cell:(+265) 0888 345 369
alt.email:patrickchinguwo at yahoo.com
blog:http://chinguwo.blogspot.com/

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/pipermail/civsoc-mw/attachments/20201007/6155c699/attachment.htm>