[civsoc-mw] No new voters roll

[KPD]

TC,

You know where I am based. I have voted in general elections 3 times. I
have voted in 2 council by-elections and 1 parliamentary by-election.

I have my voters card that I keep for 5 years and no one registers during a
by-election.

It just needs a candidate to take MEC to court for adding voters who are
not properly verified.

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 13:20 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com> wrote:

> You view is based on divination KPD. Not the law.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 7, 2020, at 7:16 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> TC,
>
> In the first paragraph is what court ruled.
>
> Paragraph 2 and 3 are my views.
>
> I brought in your views in paragraph 4. I did not want you to say, "only
> in a by-election arising from a nullification of an election"
>
> My view is that any by-election should not bring in fresh voters
> regardless of the circumstances that led to that by-election. The only
> differentiator is that in a nullification no new candidates are allowed.
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 13:05 trevor chimimba, <trevorchimimba at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> KPD
>>
>> How do you reconcile your first paragraph and the last paragraph.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2020, at 6:59 AM, KPD <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Court has ruled that there should be no new voters roll for by-elections
>> where the results were nullified. Same candidates.
>>
>> I insist that there should be no new voters roll in any by-election.
>> Registration of new voters for any by-election is illegal.
>>
>> Unfortunately, regardless of MEC being headed by a judge, it will still
>> take another judge, after wasting so much money by petitioners and
>> respondents, for MEC to do the right thing.
>>
>> The argument by TC that those who never registered in the main elections
>> should be brought in through the window and vote in a by-election doesn't
>> hold.
>>
>> Tiyeni nazo.
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>> is
>> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
>> civsoc-mw mailing list
>> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
>> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> civsoc-mw mailing list
> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> civsoc-mw mailing list
> civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
> http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/pipermail/civsoc-mw/attachments/20201007/4a7d856b/attachment.htm>