[civsoc-mw] 50+1 for Councillors and MPs

[Stanley Nazombe]

Run off was what was supposed  to have  happened between APM and Laz when neither one of them  hit 50+1. The judiciary stack it against APM and gave it to Laz with their biased decisions


-----Original Message-----
From: Keyboard Boyd Kilembey <kkilembe at gmail.com>
To: civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
Sent: Tue, Oct 13, 2020 2:56 pm
Subject: Re: [civsoc-mw] 50+1 for Councillors and MPs

We can have 50+1 with councillors and parliamentaruand but what happens if none gets 50+1? Do we do another rerun with the same candidates or we conduct a run off. Are we getting good money on the investment or this is just show biz? The concept of 50+1 is good though i think it rigged the elections against dpp.what were they thinking? They thought they could get 50+1 with udf? Really ? They should have gunned to partner Chilima.  They should have swallowed their pride. Right now their corrupt supporters would still be stealing. Remember they openly told us those who have Bern arrested are their loyal supporters.
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, 20:33 KPD, <maluwakpd at gmail.com> wrote:

Should we use majority or Simple majority in the election of councillors and MPs?
We need to change the Presidential and Parliamentary Elections Act. We can't have MPs and Councillors elected using 50+1. And we can't have the whole parliament not elected on 50+1 and subject those in by-elections to different interpretation.
Something is not right._______________________________________________
civsoc-mw mailing list
civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw

_______________________________________________
civsoc-mw mailing list
civsoc-mw at sdnp.org.mw
http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/mailman/listinfo/civsoc-mw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chambo3.sdnp.org.mw/pipermail/civsoc-mw/attachments/20201013/cc79956d/attachment.htm>